<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chuck Goes Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poptimal.com/2010/01/chuck-goes-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poptimal.com/2010/01/chuck-goes-up/</link>
	<description>Pop Culture Reviews From People Like You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cameron.cubbison</title>
		<link>http://poptimal.com/2010/01/chuck-goes-up/comment-page-1/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>cameron.cubbison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poptimal.com/?p=30760#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>Do my reviews really lack coherence? Yikes! I guess I really have been watching the show for too long...I&#039;m starting to absorb the qualities of the show&#039;s writing in my own. As for your latter comments, to quote Hans Gruber, I&#039;ll take it under advisement. 

Thanks for reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do my reviews really lack coherence? Yikes! I guess I really have been watching the show for too long&#8230;I&#8217;m starting to absorb the qualities of the show&#8217;s writing in my own. As for your latter comments, to quote Hans Gruber, I&#8217;ll take it under advisement. </p>
<p>Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Luu</title>
		<link>http://poptimal.com/2010/01/chuck-goes-up/comment-page-1/#comment-5997</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Luu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poptimal.com/?p=30760#comment-5997</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that Chuck will never be a great television show. But this series is definitely enjoyable to watch. It&#039;s not your typical tv series with a main character who has the &quot;IT&quot; factor. But it takes us to view the main character in a very different way. Chuck has a little bit of everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that Chuck will never be a great television show. But this series is definitely enjoyable to watch. It&#8217;s not your typical tv series with a main character who has the &#8220;IT&#8221; factor. But it takes us to view the main character in a very different way. Chuck has a little bit of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick</title>
		<link>http://poptimal.com/2010/01/chuck-goes-up/comment-page-1/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poptimal.com/?p=30760#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a few of your reviews for Chuck. Your writing style is interesting, but your reviews lack coherence. You might want to actually comment more on the positive parts of the episodes rather than give backhanded compliments and rant about how much you hate certain aspects of the show. Also, I&#039;d scale back the Sylvester Stallone references if I were you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a few of your reviews for Chuck. Your writing style is interesting, but your reviews lack coherence. You might want to actually comment more on the positive parts of the episodes rather than give backhanded compliments and rant about how much you hate certain aspects of the show. Also, I&#8217;d scale back the Sylvester Stallone references if I were you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

